tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7607423464526789275.post5599432785392034004..comments2017-11-22T19:49:01.967-05:00Comments on An Atheist's Analysis of Theism and Gods: Fallacies: Pascal's Wager and Special Pleadingatwopiecepuzzlehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02414249195173617569noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7607423464526789275.post-26813102979019560852010-12-05T21:10:55.241-05:002010-12-05T21:10:55.241-05:00kk just a sugestion ^^
looking forward to itkk just a sugestion ^^<br />looking forward to itAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7607423464526789275.post-27114073829224551072010-12-05T20:46:19.433-05:002010-12-05T20:46:19.433-05:00"All of my articles" so far have simply ..."All of my articles" so far have simply been regarding fallacies, errors in reasoning and logic. And yes, obviously certain arguments would fall apart if there was proof that a god existed. Why would I assume God's existence could be proven? That's a very big assumption. Can you prove your god's existence to the point where there is no uncertainty? And I will eventually make such posts, just to save time in debates. I made this blog two days ago, though, not six months ago xD. Still working on it.atwopiecepuzzlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02414249195173617569noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7607423464526789275.post-19637636258495029322010-12-05T20:18:17.926-05:002010-12-05T20:18:17.926-05:00Right, but being that its your blog and not mine, ...Right, but being that its your blog and not mine, and I don't feel like having a full debate right now, I would recommend that in a subsequent post you find some "common proofs of God" and disprove them. All of your articles are written as if you have done this already, and fall apart if you assume that you can prove God's existence to the point where you don't have to "gamble" because there is no uncertainty.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7607423464526789275.post-78836075333398843772010-12-05T19:55:16.471-05:002010-12-05T19:55:16.471-05:00Not true, for the same reason that you don't h...Not true, for the same reason that you don't have to show me evidence that after you die I wont zap you with my taser gun. You can't provide proof there is no reason to believe it, but you dont believe it, because it has no evidence. If you wish to supply me with evidence, go ahead.atwopiecepuzzlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02414249195173617569noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7607423464526789275.post-35364922771004190472010-12-05T19:38:46.005-05:002010-12-05T19:38:46.005-05:00Makes perfect sense, in absence of all evidence of...Makes perfect sense, in absence of all evidence of God's existence. Before anyone can gain meaning from this post, you need to show that there is no proof that he does.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com